Gateway Project
The Gateway Project is a proposed American rail expansion project to build a high-speed rail right-of-way and to alleviate the bottleneck along the Northeast Corridor (NEC) between Newark, New Jersey and New York City. The project would create routing alternatives and add 25 train slots during peak periods to the current system used by Amtrak (AMTK) and New Jersey Transit (NJT), which has reached full capacity.
The new right-of-way is one proposed solution to congestion at crossings of the Hudson River between New York and New Jersey. The planned route parallels the current one crossing the New Jersey Meadowlands and the river between Newark Penn Station and New York Penn Station (NYPS) in Midtown Manhattan. Major new infrastructure would include new rail bridges, new tunnels under the Hudson Palisades and the river, the conversion of parts of the James Farley Post Office into a rail station, and a new terminal annex to NYPS. Some previously planned improvements already underway have also been incorporated into the Gateway plan.
The project was unveiled in February 2011 after the 2010 cancellation of the somewhat similar Access to the Region's Core (ARC) project. Funding for the project, expected to cost $13.5 billion and be completed in 2020, remains unclear. In November 2011, US Congress allocated $15 million for initial studies. It is likely that another regional project, the proposed 7 Subway Extension from Manhattan to Secaucus Junction, will be in competition for funding.
Announcement and initial phases
The Gateway Project was unveiled on February 7, 2011, by Amtrak President Joseph Boardman and New Jersey Senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez.[1][2][3][4] The announcement also included endorsements from New York Senator Charles Schumer and Amtrak's Board of Directors. Officials said Amtrak would take the lead in seeking financing; a list of potential sources included the states of New York and New Jersey, the City of New York, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) as well as private investors.[5][6][7] In April 2011, Amtrak applied for $1.3 billion in funding for NEC rail corridor improvements from the United States Department of Transportation to be allocated to Gateway and related projects. [8] [9]
As of late 2011, two parts of the project were underway: the replacement of the Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River and the development of Moynihan Station in Manhattan. Environmental impact statements are completed and the design and engineering of the new bridges has begun.[10][11][12][13][14] The ceremonial groundbreaking of the first phase of the conversion of the Farley P.O. to a new Moynihan Station took place in October 2010.[15] Some funding for the projects comes from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
The announcement was a preliminary plan for the project, which is estimated to have a cost of $13.5 billion and has a projected completion date of 2020. The source of further funding remains unclear as does how any work done for ARC may be used. More than $600 million had been spent on that project.[16] In November 2011, US Congress allocated $15 million for engineering work for Gateway. [17] [18][19]
Background
Right-of-way
The right-of-way was originally developed by the Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR)[20] in conjunction with the 1910 opening of Pennsylvania Station (New York City) which required the construction of the Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River and the North River Tunnels under the Hudson Palisades and Hudson River. The following year the Manhattan Transfer was opened in the Kearny Meadows to allow changes between steam and electric locomotives. This also provided for passenger transfers to/from its former main terminal at Exchange Place in Jersey City or the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad (H&M), the forerunner of today's Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH).[21] The Dock Bridge over the Passaic River was opened in conjunction with adjacent new Pennsylvania Station (Newark) in 1935.[22][23] In 1937, the H&M was extended over a second span, making the transfer in the meadows redundant.[24]
In 1949, the PRR discontinued its ferry system on the Hudson and in 1961 closed its Exchange Place station.[25] In 1962, it agreed to the demolition of its Manhattan station in exchange for a smaller one under a new Madison Square Garden.[26] In 1967, the Aldene Plan was implemented, requiring the floundering Central Railroad of New Jersey (CNJ), Reading (RDG), and Lehigh Valley (LV) railroads, to travel into Newark Penn with continuing service to New York Penn.[21][27] The following year the PRR merged with New York Central (NYC), but the new Penn Central (PC) declared bankruptcy on June 21, 1970. In 1976, its long distance service (including part of today's Northeast Corridor and Empire Corridor) was taken over by Amtrak, which had been founded in 1971.[28] Conrail was created in 1976 to bail out numerous Northeast railroads, including the commuter service on the CNJ and the LV.[29][30] In 1983, when the corporation divested it passenger rail operations, they were taken over by New Jersey Transit (NJT), which had been created in 1979 to operate much of the state's bus system.[31]
In 1991, New Jersey Transit opened the Waterfront Connection, extending service on some non-electricfied trains which had previously terminated at Newark Penn Station to Hoboken.[32] In 1996, it began its Midtown Direct service, rerouting some trains from the west which previously terminated at Hoboken Terminal to New York Penn.[33][34] Secaucus Junction was opened in 2003, allowing passengers travelling from the north to transfer to Northeast Corridor Line, North Jersey Coast Line, or Midtown Direct trains, though not to Amtrak, which does not stop there. Between 1976 and 2010, the number of New Jersey Transit weekday trains crossing the Hudson using the North River Tunnels (under contract with Amtrak[35]) increased from 147 to 438.[3]
Trans-Hudson crossings
The other rail system crossing the Hudson was developed by the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad, partially in conjunction with the PRR,[36] and taken over by PANYNJ in 1962.[37] Direct trans-Hudson rail service to Lower Manhattan from Newark Penn is provided by Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH), a rapid transit system with additional terminals at World Trade Center and Herald Square in Manhattan, and at Hoboken Terminal and Journal Square in Hudson County.[38]
There are three vehicular crossings of the lower Hudson River.[39] The Holland Tunnel, opened in 1927, is minimally used for public transportation. The George Washington Bridge, opened in 1931, is used by suburban buses to GWB Bus Terminal. Its lower level, opened in 1962, is the last new river crossing.[40] The Lincoln Tunnel, composed of three tubes opened in 1937, 1945 and 1954,[41] is one of the busiest tunnel in the world. Its eastern terminus is connected via ramps to the Port Authority Bus Terminal, the gateway for most NJT bus traffic entering Manhattan.[42] While there are HOV lanes to the tunnel there are often long delays due to traffic congestion and the capacity of bus lanes at the bus terminal to handle passengers.[43][44] Part of the PANYNJ 2007-2016 Capital Plan[45] construction of bus garage in Midtown so that day-time turnover buses could avoid unnecessarily travelling through the tunnel without passengers was scraped by the agency in October 2011.[46] More than 6,000 bus trips are made through the tunnel and bus terminal daily. In Decemmber 2011, the New Jersey Assembly passed a resolution calling upon the PANYNY to address the issue of congestion.[47]
Access to the Region's Core
Launched in 1995 by PANYNJ, NJT, and MTA, Access to the Region's Core (ARC) was a Major Investment Study that looked at public transportation ideas for the New York metropolitan area. It found that long-term goals would best be met by better connections to and in-between the region's major rail stations in Midtown Manhattan, Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal.[48] The East Side Access project, including tunnels under the East River and the East Side of Manhattan, which would divert some LIRR traffic to Grand Central, is expected to be completed in 2016.
The Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel or THE Tunnel, which later took on the name of the study itself, was meant to address the western, or Hudson River, crossing. Engineering studies determined that structural interferences made a direct connection to Grand Central or the current Penn Station unfeasible and its final design involved boring under the current rail yard and 34th Street to a new deep cavern terminal station.[49][50] While Amtrak had acknowledged that the region represented a bottleneck in the national system and had originally planned to complete work by 2040,[51] its timetable for beginning the project was advanced in part due to the cancellation of ARC, a project similar in scope, but with differences in design.[52] That project, which did not include direct Amtrak participation[51][53] was cancelled in October 2010 by New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who cited potential cost overruns.[54] Amtrak briefly engaged the governor in attempt to revive the ARC Tunnel and use preliminary work done for it, but those negotiations soon broke down.[6][51][53] Amtrak said it was not interested in purchasing any of the work.[55] Senator Menendez later said some preparatory work done for ARC may be used for the new project.[56] Costs for the project were $117 million for preliminary engineering, $126 million for final design, $15 million for construction and $178 million real estate property rights ($28 million in New Jersey and $150 million in New York City). Additionally, a $161 million partially refundable pre-payment of insurance premiums was also made.[16]
Existing and new infrastructure along right of way
The current route, about 11 miles (18 km) long, includes infrastructure that is more than 100 years old. The system operates at capacity during peak hours — 23 trains per hour — and limits speed for safety reasons. The new high-speed route would run parallel to the current right-of-way, enabling dispatching alternatives, potential speed increases, and up to 25 more trains per hour. There are no plans for Amtrak to stop at Secaucus Junction, the only intermediate station and a major interchange point in the NJT system.
Newark Penn, Dock Bridge, Harrison PATH Station
Six tracks connect Newark Penn Station and the adjacent Dock Bridge over the Passaic River. The station and the west span of the bridge, carrying three tracks, were built in 1935. The east span, opened in 1937, carries one outbound track, and the two Port Authority Trans Hudson (PATH) tracks entering and leaving the station. The bridge, owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANY/NJ), underwent repairs as recently as 2009.[57] To the northeast lies the Harrsion PATH Station. Between the bridge and the station AMTK and NJT trains are aligned on three center tracks to pass through it, with the PATH using side platforms. While not part of the Gateway Project, the station itself is undergoing a $173 million reconstruction and expansion funded by the PANY/NJ which owns and operates the PATH rapid transit system. Passenger use is expected to grow as the area develops; it already includes the Red Bull Arena.[58] Maps for the Gateway Prroject indicate that an additonal, or fourth track for the NEC will be added.[3]
Kearny Meadows
At Kearny Junction, east of the former Manhattan Transfer, the rights-of-way of Amtrak, and PATH, and several NJT lines converge and run parallel to each other. While there is no junction with PATH, NJT trains can switch tracks, depending on their terminal of origination or destination, enabling Midtown Direct trains on the Morris and Essex Lines to join or depart the Northeast Corridor.[33][34] The single track limited-use Waterfront Connection connects some lines using diesel trains on Hoboken Terminal trips with the NEC to the west.[32] Currently the NEC runs on two tracks northeast of the junction. Plans call for expansion to four tracks, requiring the construction of bridges[3] in the Kearny Meadows at Newark Turnpike and Belleville Turnpike.
Portal Bridge
The current Portal Bridge, over the Hackensack River between Kearny and Secaucus, has been in operation since 1910. The rail-only swing bridge is 961 feet (293 m) long and supports two tracks.[11] Its lowest beams are 23 feet (7.0 m) above the water, so it opens regularly for shipping,[59] though not during weekday rush hours, when trains have priority.[11][60] It requires frequent servicing, is costly to maintain and limits the number of crossings as well as train speeds.[11][59]
In December 2008, the Federal Railroad Administration approved a $1.34 billion project to replace the Portal Bridge with two new bridges: a three-track bridge to the north, and a two-track bridge to the south, after completion of environmental impact statements.[11] In 2009, New Jersey applied for funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and on January 28, 2010, received $38.5 million for design.[61] Current plans call for two two-track bridges.[3] Cycling advocates, with the support of Senator Lautenberg, are lobbying to include bike paths as part of the East Coast Greenway.[13][62] Construction was scheduled to begin in 2010, and the new bridges are scheduled to be completed in 2017, at which time the Portal Bridge will be dismantled.[2][3][10][11][52][63] In April 2011, Amtrak applied for $570 million for construction from US DOT. New Jersey is expected to contribute $150 million.[9]
Secaucus Junction
Opened on December 15, 2003, Secaucus Junction is an interchange station served by nine of New Jersey Transit's rail lines, and is sited where Hoboken Terminal trains intersect with those traveling along the Northeast Corridor. Passenger transfers are possible, but there is no rail junction. While the ARC had planned a loop to create a junction,[64] plans for the Gateway Project do not. Amtrak trains pass through the station, but do not stop there, nor are there plans to include an Amtrak stop.[3]
Gateway Tunnel
The current North River Tunnels allow for 23 one-way crossings per hour during peak periods.[65] The ARC Tunnel was to be built in three sections: under the Hudson Palisades, the Hudson River, and the streets of Manhattan where it would have dead-ended. The Gateway Tunnel will likely be built along the same footprint of its first two parts, but will enable trains to join the current interlocking once it emerges. A flying junction is planned for later stages.[3] This will allow AMTK and NJT continued access to the East River Tunnels and Sunnyside Yards, used for staging and storage, and for use by Amtrak's NEC through-service trains. Capacity on the system will be increased by an additional 25 trains per hour. In April 2011 requested $188 million in federal funding for preliminary engineering studies and environmental analysis.[8][9]
Palisades Tunnel
Initial work for the ARC Tunnel had begun before its cancellation. The project's groundbreaking was held on June 8, 2009.[66] at the site of new underpass at Tonnelle Avenue in North Bergen where western portal of the tunnel through Hudson Palisades would have been located, just south of that of the North River Tunnels. The first major tunneling contract for the project had been awarded on May 5, 2010 to Skanska.[67][68] The land at its portal, which cost $26.3 million, is now owned by NJT.[69] According to maps released at the announcement of the Gateway Project the tunnel under the Palisades will follow the same route to a location near the Weehawken-Hoboken border.[3]
Hudson River Tunnel
The Gateway Hudson River tunnel will travel from a point at Weehawken Cove under the Hudson River and its eastern portal south of West Side Yard in Manhattan.[3] Engineering studies for ARC along this route had been deemed unfeasible.[70] The yards are slated to be developed as a residential and commercial district on platform constructed over them as part of Hudson Yards.[71][72] Surveys of properties which would or would not be affected by underground construction at underground eastern end of the ARC Tunnel had been completed.[73]
New York Penn
The original Pennsylvania Station (New York City) was completed in 1910. The station's air rights were optioned in the 1950s and called for the demolition of the head-house and train shed, while the tracks, well below street level, would remain. Demolition began in October 1963. The Pennsylvania Plaza complex, including Madison Square Garden, was completed in 1968.[26] The station is used by Amtrak, New Jersey Transit, and the Long Island Railroad (LIRR), and is served by several New York City Subway lines.
Since 1976, the number of weekday train movements at New York Penn Station, including those of Amtrak, NJT, and LIRR, has increased 89%, from 661 to 1248, and is considered to be at capacity.[3] In 2010, the station saw 550,000 daily boardings/alightings.[7][74][75] making it the "busiest, most congested, passenger transportation facility in North America on a daily basis"[76].
Moynihan Station
In the early 1990s, then-New York Senator Daniel Moynihan announced plans to convert portions of the James Farley Post Office to a train station.[74][77] Opened in 1912, soon after the original Pennsylvania Station, the landmark building is the city's main post office. It stands across from Penn Plaza and is built over tracks approaching the station from the west.[78][79]
The project languished for almost two decades, until the final chunk of the $267 million in funding for the first phase of the conversion was secured in early 2010. The phase will expand and improve the 33rd Street Connector between Penn Station and its West End Concourse. Located under the grand staircase of the post office, the concourse will be widened to serve nine of Pennsylvania Station's 11 platforms, and new street entrances will be opened from the southeast and northeast corners of the Farley building.[80] Some $169 million provided by federal and state sources was already in place[81] when a Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant arrived in early 2010.[14] A ceremonial groundbreaking and signing for the $83 million in funds took place in October.[15]
No timetable has been set for further phases, which may include public-private partnerships.[82] In April 2011 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that the state had applied for $49.8 million in federal funding for the final design of Phase 2 of the station's conversion.[83], but was not honored.[76]
The Gateway Project will have little effect on the first phase of the Farley conversion.[3] The second phase of the renovation is planned to make the post office Amtrak's New York Gateway, though in December 2011 it said that would likely be unable to afford increased operating costs if should re-locate. The unsuccessful application leaves the project unfunded. The agency redevloping the building is being folded into the PANYNJ in the belief that it can better handle the oversee reconstruction as well as provide or secure monies.[76]
Penn Station South
Penn Station South will be located on the block south of the current New York Penn Station at 31st Street and diagonally across Eighth Avenue from the post office, on land which is currently privately held. While the PANYNJ had been acquiring land for ARC along its route, acquisition south of the station has not begun.[4] It is likely the entire block would be razed and made available for highrise construction after completion of the station.[84] Plans call for seven tracks served by four platforms in what will be a terminal annex to the entire station complex.[3] In April 2011 Amtrak requested $50 million in federal funding for preliminary engineering and environmental analysis.[8][9]
Related projects
Other projects in Tri-State (NY-NJ-CT) metropolitan area are planned as part of the NEC Next Generation High Speed Rail, including the northern and southern approaches to the Gateway Project.
New Brunswick-Trenton
In May 2011, $450 million was dedicated to a six-year project to support capacity increases on one of the busiest segments on the NEC. The project is designed to upgrade electrical power, signal systems and overhead catenary wires on a 24 miles (39 km) section between New Brunswick and Trenton to improve reliability, increase speeds up to 160 mph (260 km/h), and support more frequent high-speed service.[85][86][87] Funding for the project and others announced at the same time had not been "obligated" by Congress and was threatened to be diverted by a bill passed by the House of Representatives in July 2011,[88][89] but was later secured to allow work to proceed.[90]
Harold Interlocking and Hutchinson River
Over 750 LIRR, NJT, and Amtrak trains travel through the Harold Interlocking everyday, causing frequent conflicts and delays.[90]In May 2011, a $294.7 million federal grant was awarded to address congestion the the USA's busiest rail junction and part of the Sunnyside Yard in Queens. The work will allow for a dedicated tracks to the New York Connecting Railroad right of way for AMTK trains arriving from or bound for New England, thus avoiding NJT and LIRR traffic.[91][92][93] A new flyover will allow Amtrak trains to travel through the interlocking separately from LIRR trains, and NJ TRANSIT trains on their way to Sunnyside.[90] Financing for the project was placed in jeopardy by House of Representtatives in July 2011 which voted to divert the funding to unrelated projects.[89], but was later obligated so that work on the project can began in 2012.[90]
Amtrak has applied for $15 million for the environmental impact studies and preliminary engineering design to examine replacement options for the more than 100-year-old, low-level movable rail bridge (just west of Pelham Bridge) over the Hutchinson River in The Bronx. The goal is for a new bridge to support expanded service and speeds up to 110 mph (177 kph).[94]
7 Subway service
While not part of the Gateway Project, Amtrak's announcement included a proposal to extend the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) 7 Subway Extension five blocks east to New York Penn Station from the currently planned station at 10th Avenue and 34th Street. This would provide service to the Javits Convention Center and a one seat ride to Grand Central Terminal, the city's other major train terminal on the East Side of Manhattan at 42nd Street.[3] Shortly before the introduction of Gateway, the New York City Economic Development Corporation voted to budget up to $250,000 for a feasibility study of a Hudson River tunnel for an extension to Secaucus Junction awarded to Parsons Brinckerhoff, a major engineering firm that had been working on the ARC tunnel.[95][96] In October 2011, Bloomberg reiterated his support for the NJ extension, estimated to cost around $10 billion and take ten years to complete, indicating that he would give approval by the end of his third term in 2013. Environmental-impact studies and a full business plan are required before the proposal proceeds.[97] It is likely that the two projects - Gateway and the subway line - will be in competition for funding.[98]
See also
References
- ^ Rouse, Karen (February 8, 2011). "Amtrak president details Gateway Project at Rutgers lecture". Bergen Record. http://www.northjersey.com/news/020811_Amtrak_president_details_Gateway_Project_at_Rutgers_lecture.html. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ a b Frassinelli, Mike (February 6, 2011). "N.J. senators, Amtrak official to announce new commuter train tunnel project across the Hudson". The Star-Ledger. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/02/nj_senators_to_announce_new_co.html. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Gateway Project" (PDF). Amtrak. February 2011. http://lautenberg.senate.gov/assets/Gateway.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
- ^ a b McGeehan, Patrick (February 7, 2011). "With One Plan for a Hudson Tunnel Dead, Senators Offer Another Option". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/nyregion/08tunnel.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Amtrak%20new%20jersey&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ "Lautenberg, Menendez Join Amtrak to Announce New Trans-Hudson Gateway Tunnel Project" (Press release). Lautenberg/US Senate press release. February 7, 2011. http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=330933. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
- ^ a b Frassinelli, Mike (February 8, 2011). "Gov. Christie says new Gateway tunnel plan addresses his ARC project cost concerns". The Star-Ledger. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/02/gov_christie_approves_of_new_g.html. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ a b Caruso, Lisa (February 7, 2011). "Amtrak Proposes $13.5 Billion New Jersey Rail Project". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/07/AR2011020703557.html. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b c "Amtak Seeks $1.3 billion for Gateway Project and Next-Generation High-Speed Rail on NEC". Amtrak. April4, 2011. http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1249224538367&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobhead. Retrieved 2011-04-08.
- ^ a b c d Jackson, Herb (April 4, 2011), "Amtrak seeking $1.3B for Hudson River tunnel planning, bridge replacement", The Record, http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/040411_Amtrak_seeking_13B_for_Hudson_River_tunnel_planning_bridge_replacement.html, retrieved 201-04-10
- ^ a b "Portal Bridge Capacity Enhancement". Amtrak, New Jersey Transit, U.S Department of Transportation. http://www.portalbridgenec.com. Retrieved 2011-02-08.
- ^ a b c d e f Belsen, Ken (December 31, 2008). "Approval Given for New Jersey Rail Bridges". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/01/nyregion/01bridge.html. Retrieved 2011-02-08.
- ^ Frassinelli, Mike (January 28, 2010). "NJ Transit announces $38.5M for Portal Bridge project, names executive director". The Star-Ledger. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/01/nj_transit_board_announces_385.html. Retrieved 2011-02-08.
- ^ a b Whiten, Jon (Feb 8th, 2010). "Advocates Want Bike/Ped Path as Part of Portal Bridge Project". Jersey City Independent. http://www.jerseycityindependent.com/2010/02/08/advocates-want-bikeped-path-as-part-of-portal-bridge-project/. Retrieved 2011-02-08.
- ^ a b "TIGER grant provides final piece of the Moynihan Station funding puzzle". United States Department of Transportation. October 19, 2010. http://fastlane.dot.gov/2010/10/tiger-grant-provides-final-piece-of-the-puzzle-for-moynihan-station.html. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ a b Bagli, Charles (October 18, 2010). "A Ceremonial Start for Moynihan Station". New York Times. http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/a-ceremonial-start-for-moynihan-station/?scp=1&sq=Moynihan%20Station&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ a b Pillets, Jeff (February 28, 2011), "State wants refund for $161.9M tunnel insurance", The Record, http://www.northjersey.com/recap/117040328_State_wants_refund_for__161_9M_tunnel_insurance.html, retrieved 2011-03-14
- ^ Frassinelli, Mike (November 18, 2011), "Engineering work to begin on Gateway train tunnel under Hudson River, Congress approves $15M for project", The Star-Ledger, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/11/engineering_work_to_begin_on_g.html, retrieved 2011-11-22
- ^ Boburg, Shawn (November 2, 2011), "Senate OKs $15M in design funds for NJ-NY tunnel", The Reocrd, http://www.northjersey.com/news/state/The_Source_blog_Senate_clears_15M_for_Amtrak_Gateway_tunnel_planning.html, retrieved 2011-11-02
- ^ "U.S. Senate Approves Funding For NJ-NY Rail Tunnel Design". November 2, 2011. http://njtoday.net/2011/11/02/u-s-senate-approves-funding-for-nj-ny-rail-tunnel-design//. Retrieved 2011-11-02.
- ^ Prout, H.G. (September 14, 1902). "The Pennsylvania's Great Hudson River Tunnel". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40716FD345D12738DDDAD0994D1405B828CF1D3&scp=10&sq=Point%20No%20Point%20Pennsylvania%20Railroad&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b Cudahy, Brian J. (2002). Rails under the mighty Hudson: The Story of the Hudson Tubes, the Pennsy Tunnels and Manhattan Transfer. Hudson Valley Heritage Series (2nd ed.). New York: Fordham University Press. ISBN 0-8232-2189-X. http://books.google.com/?id=9odNXTGhwyAC.
- ^ "Newark Adopts Plans for New Rail Station; How Newark Railroad Station Will Look". New York Times. May 14, 1931. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0A13F9345C157A93C6A8178ED85F458385F9&scp=3&sq=newark+railroad&st=p. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
- ^ "Newark Dedicates its New Terminal; Railroad Station, Centre Link in $42,000,000 Project, Is Opened to the Public". New York Times. March 24, 1935. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20C16FC355B107A93C6AB1788D85F418385F9&scp=7&sq=newark+railroad&st=p. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
- ^ "New Station Open for Hudson Tubes". The New York Times: p. 1. June 20, 1937. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0B14FB3A541B728DDDA90A94DE405B878FF1D3. Retrieved 2011-02-18.
- ^ Karnoutsos, Carmela; Shalhoub, Patrick (2007). "Exchange Place". Jersey City Past and Present. New Jersey City University. http://www.njcu.edu/programs/jchistory/Pages/E_Pages/Exchange_Place.htm. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b "Penn Station". New York Architecture Images - gone. www.nyc-architecture.com. http://www.nyc-architecture.com/GON/GON004.htm. Retrieved 2011-02-18.
- ^ French, Kenneth (2002). Images of America:Railroads of Hoboken and Jersey City. USA: Arcadia Publishing. pp. 30. ISBN 978-0-7385-0966-2. http://www.arcadiapublsihing.com.
- ^ Pinkston, Elizabeth (2003). "A Brief History of Amtrak." The Past and Future of U.S. Passenger Rail Service. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congressional Budget Office)
- ^ "A Brief History of Conrail". Consolidated Rail Corporation. 2003. http://www.conrail.com/history.htm. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ "Conrail, The Consolidated Rail Corporation". American-Rails.com. http://www.american-rails.com/conrail.html. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ Pulley, Brett (February 10, 1996). "Crash on New Jersey Transit;Agency Had Enviable Safety Record". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9806E1DC1539F933A25751C0A960958260&scp=4&sq=Crash%20on%20New%20Jersey%20Tranist&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b Hanley, Robert (September 10, 1991). "Hoboken-Newark Rail Link Opens as Part of Multimillion-Dollar Expansion". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE0D81731F933A2575AC0A967958260&scp=2&sq=Waterfront%20Connection%20New%20Jersey%20Transit&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-20.
- ^ a b Chen, David W. (December 8, 1996). "All Aboard for New York, if There's Parking Near the Train". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9806E5D6163FF93BA35751C1A960958260&sec=&spon=&&scp=5&sq=Kearny%20connection&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b Hanley, Robert (May 1, 1991). "New Jersey to Add Trains to Midtown". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE5D7173AF932A35756C0A967958260&scp=1&sq=Kearny%20connection&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ Sullivan, John (June 2, 2002). "New Jersey's Amtrak Blues". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/30/nyregion/new-jersey-s-amtrak-blues.html?scp=1&sq=New%20Jersey's%20Amtrak%20Blues&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-27.
- ^ "By Way of Jersey". New York Times. September 4, 1910. http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70810F7355D16738DDDAD0894D1405B808DF1D3. Retrieved 2011-02-27.
- ^ "PATH Rail History". Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. http://www.panynj.gov/about/history-path.html. Retrieved 2011=03-07.
- ^ "PATH map". Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. http://www.panynj.gov/path/maps.html. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
- ^ Editorial (November 17, 2007). "Time to Move on Hudson Tunnel". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/opinion/nyregionopinions/CIcongest.html?scp=40&sq=Amtrak+new+jersey&st=nyt. Retrieved 2011-02-27.
- ^ "Transit Friendly Development". Voorhees Transportation Center/Rutgers University. May 2009. http://policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/tod/newsletter/vol5-num1/ARC.html. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
- ^ PANYNJ, "History Across the Hudson", The Star Ledger, http://media.nj.com/ledgerupdates_impact/photo/hudson-river-tunnel-historyjpg-41ba3e9d7448b3e1.jpg, retrieved 2011-03-15
- ^ "Port Authority Bus Terminal History". Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. http://www.panynj.gov/bus-terminals/pabt-history.html. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
- ^ Chernetz, Janna (April 28, 2011). "NJ Transportation Funding Plan Would Shortchange Bus Riders". Mobilizing the Region. http://blog.tstc.org/2011/04/28/nj-transportation-funding-plan-would-shortchange-bus-riders/. Retrieved 2011-04-29.
- ^ Grossman, Andrew (April 19, 2011), "Bus Terminal Hits Limit", The Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703916004576271150274132500.html, retrieved 2011-04-29
- ^ Duane, Tom (January 20, 2011), letter to Christopher Ward, Director PANYNJ, http://www.tomduane.com/News%202011/Letters%202011/Bus%20garage%20letter.html, retrieved 2011-12-03
- ^ Boburg, Shawn; Rouse, Karen (October 2, 2011), "Cut in toll hike killed funds for $800M garage, PA says", The Record, http://www.northjersey.com/news/130956618_Port_Authority_toll_hikes_will_not_fund_new_bus_parking_in_NYC__causign_delays_for_New_Jersey_commuters.html, retrieved 2011-12-03
- ^ Boburg, Shawn (December 7, 2011), "Lawmakers urge PA to reduce bus delays", The Record, http://www.northjersey.com/news/transportation/135160048_Lawmakers_urge_PA_to_reduce_bus_delays.html, retrieved 2011-12-14
- ^ "Access to the Region's Core Major Investment Study Summary Report 2003" (PDF). http://www.arctunnel.com.+2003. http://www.arctunnel.com/pdf/library/ARC_MIS_Summary_Report.pdf. Retrieved 2011-03-06.
- ^ New Jersey Transit (October 2008). Newark, NJ. "Access to the Region's Core: Final Environmental Impact Study." Executive Summary.
- ^ Rassmussen, Ian (15 Dec 2010). "When an Environmental Impact Statement takes a lifetime". New Urban News. http://newurbannetwork.com/news-opinion/blogs/ian-rassmussen/13726/when-environmental-impact-statement-takes-lifetime. Retrieved 2022-03-07. "The story of ARC began in 1995 with the start of a “Major Investment Study” that reviewed 137 alternative transportation improvements that would get commuters from central and northern New Jersey out of their cars, and into Manhattan faster, cheaper, and with less harm to the environment. After four years of study, the list was narrowed down to a few finalists in 1999. From 1999 to 2003, the feasibility of each of those plans (exactly where the tracks would be laid, and how they would connect to Penn Station) was studied, and the ultimate plan ironed out. From 2003 to 2009, the final plan — two new rail tunnels leading to a new lower level of Penn Station — was the subject of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)."
- ^ a b c Frassinelli, Mike (November 8, 2010). "Hudson River tunnel project proposed by Amtrak, NJ Transit would take decades to complete". The Star Ledger. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/11/similar_hudson_river_tunnel_pr.html. Retrieved 2011-02-27.
- ^ a b Fleisher, Liza; Grossman, Andrew (February 8, 2011), "Amtrak's Plan For New Tunnel Gains Support", The Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704422204576130673174593178.html, retrieved 2011-02-08
- ^ a b "Amtrak, NJ Transit break off talks on reviving ARC Hudson River rail tunnel", nj.com, November 12, 2010, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/11/amtrak_nj_transit_break_off_ta.html, retrieved 2011-03-07
- ^ McGeehan, Patrick (October 7, 2010). "Christie Halts Train Tunnel, Citing Its Cost". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/08/nyregion/08tunnel.html. Retrieved October 8, 2010.
- ^ "Amtrak: no interest in Hudson tunnel", nj.com, November 13, 2010, http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1289633139318930.xml&coll=3, retrieved 2011-03-13
- ^ Higgs, Larry (February 8, 2011). "Amtrak plans new tunnel under Hudson River". www.mycentraljersey.com. http://www.mycentraljersey.com/article/20110207/NJNEWS10/110207021/1254/NJSPORTS. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
- ^ "Rules and Regulation". Federal Register 74 (101): 25448. Thursday, May 28, 2009. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-12383.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-14.
- ^ "The Harrison PATH Station". Daily Harrison. http://www.dailyharrison.com/harrison-path-station. Retrieved 2011-02-15.
- ^ a b Baldwin, Zoe (January 8, 2009). "Feds Open "Portal" to Expansion of NJ Transit's Network". Mobilizing the Region. http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/. Retrieved 2011-02-10.
- ^ [1] Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, Volume 1, July 1, 2007, U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access, pages 616-617 CITE: 33CFR117.723
- ^ "High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program". www.gov. http://www.dot.gov/recovery/docs/hsiprapplist.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-10.
- ^ Copeland, Denise; Betty the Bike (June 1, 2010). "Senator Lautenberg lends his support to bike and pedestrian access on the new Portal Bridge over the Hackensack". nj.com. http://blog.nj.com/nj_off-road_biking/2010/06/lautenberg_supports_access_on_portal_bridge.html. Retrieved 2011-02-19.
- ^ "AECOM JV Bags US$18 Mln Contract For New Jersey's Portal Bridge Replacement Project - Quick Facts". RTT News. January 5, 2010. http://www.rttnews.com/Content/QuickFacts.aspx?Node=B1&Id=1170705%20&Category=Quick%20Facts. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
- ^ "ARC Access to the Region's Core". New Jersey Transit. http://www.arctunnel.com/. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ "NJ Transit’s Response to Shifting Travel Demand in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001". Travel Trends (New Brunswick: The Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center) 3. Fall 2006. http://policy.rutgers.edu/vtc/reports/REPORTS/traveltrends-winter2006.pdf. Retrieved 2011-03-08. "NJ TRANSIT financed a new High Density Signal system in conjunction with the Kearny Connection, Montclair Connection and Secaucus Transfer projects that allowed the total number of NJ TRANSIT and Amtrak peak period trains operating in the heavily congested NewarkPSNY corridor to increase from 18 per hour to 23. The new signal system enabled NJ TRANSIT to substantially increase its share of peak hour trains, from 11 (of theprior capacity of 18) to 17 or 18, depending on the hour,of the 23 now available. (The “New Initiatives” agreement anticipated a capacity of 25 trains during the peak hour; however, NJ TRANSIT and Amtrak, through informal agreement, have limited the maximum number of hourly moves to 23 because of the continuing need to “reverse” trains out of New York back to New Jersey to make additional runs. These “reverse moves” cross the path of inbound trains and consume one or two precious peak slots per hour into New York."
- ^ "New Jersey Breaks Ground on Nation's Largest Transit Project" (Press release). New Jersey Transit. June 8, 2009. http://www.njtransit.com/tm/tm_servlet.srv?hdnPageAction=PressReleaseTo&PRESS_RELEASE_ID=2516. Retrieved February 13, 2010.
- ^ Skanska to Construct Rail Tunnel in New York for USD 52 M, Approximately SEK 380 M, May 18, 2010, http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100517007289/en/Skanska-Construct-Rail-Tunnel-York-USD-52
- ^ Finkelstein, Alex (May 18, 2010). "Skanska Constructing $258 Million Palisades Tunnel for New Jersey Transit". http://www.realestatechannel.com/us-markets/commercial-real-estate-1/real-estate-news-skanska-new-jersey-transit-palisades-tunnel-trans-hudson-express-project-skanska-usa-civil-2555.php. Retrieved 2011-02-19.
- ^ Wilshe, Brett (October 31, 2010). "With ARC tunnel scrapped, NJ Transit officials wonder what to do with $26.3 million worth of North Bergen property". The Jersey Journal. http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2010/10/with_arc_tunnel_scrapped_nj_tr.html. Retrieved 2011-02-15.
- ^ Barbara, Philip (Sunday, April 26, 2009), "Planned Hudson River rail tunnel isn't perfect, but it's good", nj.com, http://blog.nj.com/njv_guest_blog/2009/04/planned_hudson_river_rail_tunn.html, retrieved 2011-03-06, "One previous ARC design had a new NJ Transit station below Penn Station, which would enable all train platforms to be under one roof. But geologists found softer rock formations from an ancient stream bed that would not provide the necessary structural integrity required of new construction.....But planners found they could not repeat in a built-up city what the Pennsylvania Railroad did when it built the existing tunnel 100 years ago by digging a wide trench through the west side of Manhattan. The only solution was to dig deep -- low enough to avoid the historic 90-foot-deep shoreline bulkhead and the New York Subway No. 7 line's extension. From that depth and in a short distance, trains can't reliably rise to make it into Penn Station. After repeated review, it was concluded a spur from the new tunnel was impossible."
- ^ Bagli, Charles V. (December 21, 2009). "Rezoning Will Allow Railyard Project to Advance". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/nyregion/22hudson.html. Retrieved 2009-12-22.
- ^ "MTA Finalizes Hudson Yards Deal". Metropolitan Transportation Authority. May 26, 2010. http://www.mta.info/news/stories/?story=67. Retrieved 2010-05-31.
- ^ "New York Property Information". Access to the Region's Core. PANYNJ/NJT. 2011. http://www.arctunnel.com/property/. Retrieved 2011-03-06.
- ^ a b Editorial (February 23, 2010). "Moynihan Station, Finally?". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/opinion/24wed4.html?scp=2&sq=Moynihan%20Station&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ Grynbaum, Micheal M. (October 18, 2010). "The Joys and Woes of Penn Station at 100". New York Times. http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/the-joys-and-woes-of-penn-station-at-100/?scp=2&sq=Penn%20Station%20busiest&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- ^ a b c Jaffee, Eric (December 22, 2011), "Can Amtrak Afford Its New NYC Home?", Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2011/12/can-amtrak-afford-its-new-nyc-home/791/, retrieved December 28, 2011
- ^ Blumenthal, Sidney (March 14, 1994). "To the Pennsylvania Station". The New York. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1994/03/14/1994_03_14_070_TNY_CARDS_000367637. Retrieved 2011-02-19.
- ^ Lueck, Thomas J. (November 11, 1999). "A $60 Million Step Forward In Rebuilding Penn Station". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/19/nyregion/a-60-million-step-forward-in-rebuilding-penn-station.html?scp=50&sq=Moynihan%20Farley%20Penn&st=cse. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ "No. 7 Subway Extension - Hudson Yards Rezoning and Development Program". www.nyc.gov. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/hyards/hy_chap11_g1_fgeis_final.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ "A Message from the President of Moynihan Station Development Corporation". Empire State Development. http://www.empire.state.ny.us/Subsidiaries_Projects/MSDC/MSDC.html. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ Michaelson, Juliette (February 16, 2010). "Moynihan Station Awarded Federal Grant". http://www.moynihanstation.org/newsite/TIGER_statement_Friends_of_Moynihan_Station.pdf. Retrieved 2010-02-17.
- ^ Smerd, Jeremy (October 11, 2010). "Hotel, big retail eyed for Moynihan Station". Crains New York. http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20101011/REAL_ESTATE/101019987#. Retrieved 2011-02-09.
- ^ "Governor Cuomo Seeks Federal Funds for High-Speed Rail Projects" (Press release). Governor's Press Office. April 4, 2011. http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/040411highspeedrailproject. Retrieved 2011-04-20.
- ^ "Midtown block would likely get razed for Gateway plan". Local news. dnainfo.co,. February 17, 2011. http://www.dnainfo.com/20110217/midtown/midtown-block-would-likely-get-razed-for-gateway-plan. Retrieved 2011-03-97.
- ^ Frassinelli, Mike (Monday, May 9, 2011), "Feds steer $450M to N.J. for high-speed rail", The Star Ledger, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/05/amtrak_to_receive_800m_from_ca.html, retrieved 2011-05-13
- ^ Thorbourne, Ken (May 09, 2011), "Amtrak to receive nearly $450 million in high speed rail funding", The Jersey Journal, http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2011/05/amtrak_to_receive_nearly_450_m.html, retrieved 2011-05-13
- ^ McGeehan, Patrick (May 9, 2011), scp=2&sq=Ray%20Lahood&st=cse "Florida's rejected rail funds flow north", The New York Times, http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/09/floridas-rejected-rail-funds-flow-north/? scp=2&sq=Ray%20Lahood&st=cse, retrieved 2011-05-13
- ^ Frassinelli, Mike (July 16, 2011). "House passes bill that would divert money from electrical upgrades on N.J. Northeast". The Star-Ledger. http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/house_of_representatives_passe_1.html. Retrieved 2011-07-16.
- ^ a b "House Vote Jeopardizes Key Northeast Rail Projects". Back on Track: Northeast. The Business Alliance for Northeast Mobility. July 20, 2011. http://www.northeastbizalliance.org/blog/. Retrieved 2011-07-21.
- ^ a b c d Schned, Dan (August 24, 2011). "U.S. DOT Obligates $745 Million to Northeast Corridor Rail Projects". America 2050. http://www.america2050.org/2011/08/us-dot-obligates-745-million-to-northeast-corridor-rail-projects.html. Retrieved 2011-11-24.
- ^ "HAROLD interlocking (New York City)". wikimapia.org. http://wikimapia.org/10839077/HAROLD-interlocking. Retrieved 2011-05-13.
- ^ "Maloney Hails Federal Grant to Ease Amtrak Delays in NYC, Spur High-Speed Rail in NE Corridor - $294.7 Million Grant to Improve “Harold Interlocking”, a Delay-Plagued Junction For Trains in the NE Corridor". May 09, 2011. http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=2358&Itemid=61. Retrieved 2011-05-13.
- ^ Colvin, Jill (May 9, 2011). "New York Awarded $350 Million for High-Speed Rail Projects". DNAinfo.com. http://www.dnainfo.com/20110509/midtown/new-york-awarded-350-million-for-highspeed-rail-projects. Retrieved 2011-05-13.
- ^ "Amtak Seeks $1.3 billion for Gateway Project and Next-Generation High-Speed Rail on NEC". Amtrak. April 4, 2011. http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1249224538367&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobhead. Retrieved 2011-04-08.
- ^ Bernstein, Andrea (February 4, 2011). "City finally puts $$$ behind subway to New Jersey". Transportation Nation. http://transportationnation.org/2011/02/04/city-finally-puts-behind-subway-to-new-jersey/. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
- ^ New York City Economic Development Commission (February 2, 2011). "No. 7 Line Extension to Secaucus Consultant Services" (PDF). www.scribd.com. http://www.scribd.com/doc/48185181/No-7-Extension-Executive-Committee-Item-Final-Draft-2. Retrieved 2011-02-07.
- ^ "N.Y. mayor Bloomberg supports extending No. 7 subway into N.J.", The Star-Ledger, October 26, 2011, http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/10/new_york_mayor_michael_bloombe.html, retrieved 2011-11-22
- ^ Higgs, Larry (November 19, 2011), "Obama expected to OK $15M for tunnel project between Secaucus and New York -- Amtrak tunnel vs. extended subway to Secaucus showdown likely", Asbury Park Press, http://www.app.com/article/20111118/NJNEWS/311180048/Senate-allots-15M-for-study-on-rail-tunnel, retrieved 2011-11-23
|
|
Hoboken Division |
|
|
|
Newark Division |
|
|
Proposed |
|
|
Connections |
|
|
Other information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-speed trains |
300 km/h/186.4 mph or more
|
- AGV
- AVE Class 100, 102, 103
- CRH 2C, 3C, 380A, 380B, 380C, 380D,
- ETR 500
- Eurostar
- ICE 3
- KTX-I
- KTX-II
- Oaris
- Shinkansen Series 500, N700, E5, E6, L0
- AVRIL
- TGV Sud-Est (refurbished), Atlantique, Réseau, Duplex, POS
- Thalys PBA, PBKA
- THSR 700T
- Transrapid
- Shanghai Maglev Train
- Velaro
- Bombardier Zefiro
|
|
250–299 km/h (155.3–185.8 mph)
|
- Avant class 104, Avant class 114
- China Railways CRH 1A, 1B, 1E, 2A, 2B, 2E, 5A
- ETR 450, 460, 470, 480, New Pendolino
- ICE 1, 2
- Pendolino
- RENFE Class 120, 121, 130
- Sapsan
- Shinkansen Series 200, 300, 700, 800, E2, E3
- TCDD HT65000
- TGV Sud-Est (original), La Poste
- V250
- Zefiro 250
|
|
200–249 km/h (124.3–154.7 mph)
|
|
|
|
By country
planned lines in italics |
|
|
Technologies |
|
|
See also: Experimental and prototype high-speed trains (category), High-speed railway lines (category)
|
|
External links